{"id":60,"date":"2012-11-03T09:41:04","date_gmt":"2012-11-03T14:41:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/?p=60"},"modified":"2012-11-03T21:42:38","modified_gmt":"2012-11-04T02:42:38","slug":"barone-v-silver","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/2012\/11\/03\/barone-v-silver\/","title":{"rendered":"Barone v. Silver"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Political\u00a0analyst\u00a0Michael Barone <a href=\"http:\/\/washingtonexaminer.com\/barone-going-out-on-a-limb-romney-wins-handily\/article\/2512470#.UJV-S2k5w1e\">has a column out predicting that Governor Mitt Romney will defeat President Barack Obama<\/a>\u00a0rather handily. Meanwhile, Nate Silver at FiveThirtyEight, as of this writing, <a href=\"http:\/\/fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com\/\">has Obama as better than a 4:1 favorite<\/a>. Only one of them can be correct, of course, and that&#8217;s nothing new. But Barone calls the winner of 15 individual states &#8212; most analysts don&#8217;t bother to do that.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s turn Barone&#8217;s picks into wagers, instead, with the odds set by Silver. Or, for sake of clarity, what if Silver sold $1,000 payout wagers on the outcomes of each of the 15 states Barone listed, with the price of each such wager being $10 per percentage point that Silver&#8217;s model predicts? For example, let&#8217;s say Barone wanted to bet that Romney would win Indiana. (That&#8217;s one of his 15 picks.) Silver says that Romney is a 99.8% chance to win it, so Barone pays $998. If Romney wins Indiana, he&#8217;d get $1,000; otherwise, Silver would keep Barone&#8217;s money.<\/p>\n<p>Barone made the following picks. In the parentheses after each pick is Silver&#8217;s odds, at $1 per .1%, that the person Barone chose will win the state. That&#8217;s how much it&#8217;d cost Barone to make that $1,000 payout wager.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Barone&#8217;s picks, Romney to win:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>* Indiana ($998)<\/p>\n<p>* North Carolina ($796)<\/p>\n<p>* Florida ($548)<\/p>\n<p>* Ohio ($162)<\/p>\n<p>* Virginia ($330)<\/p>\n<p>* Colorado ($321)<\/p>\n<p>* Iowa ($193)<\/p>\n<p>* New Hampshire ($196)<\/p>\n<p>* Pennsylvania ($34)<\/p>\n<p>* Wisconsin ($56)<\/p>\n<p>In total, Barone is paying $3,634 for a combined chance at winning $10,000. Most of that upside comes from longshot bets (according to Silver, at least) in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Iowa, and New Hampshire. But that&#8217;s how odds work.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Barone&#8217;s picks, Obama to win:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>* Minnesota ($990)<\/p>\n<p>* Oregon ($987)<\/p>\n<p>* New Mexico ($989)<\/p>\n<p>* New Jersey ($998)<\/p>\n<p>* Michigan ($986)<\/p>\n<p>Not a lot of upside here, but also, not a lot of risk. (Again, that&#8217;s how odds should work.) Barone&#8217;s risking $4,950 to win $5,000, which means he can make $50 here. Consider it a hedge against his Wisconsin wager, I guess.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll revisit this post on Tuesday\/Wednesday to see how well Barone did against Silver&#8217;s odds. It may not be worth it to bother with his Obama-to-win bets (or, for that matter, Indiana) as there&#8217;s no meaningful disagreement between the two, and a miss by both would skew the numbers dramatically.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Political\u00a0analyst\u00a0Michael Barone has a column out predicting that Governor Mitt Romney will defeat President Barack Obama\u00a0rather handily. Meanwhile, Nate Silver at FiveThirtyEight, as of this writing, has Obama as better than a 4:1 favorite. Only one of them can be correct, of course, and that&#8217;s nothing new. But Barone calls the winner of 15 individual [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62,"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60\/revisions\/62"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dlewis.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}